Law & Religion UK is intended as a forum for what (we hope) is academically-rigorous exploration of the interactions between law and religion – broadly defined – together with the human rights issues associated with them. We are always interested in guest posts from colleagues in the field of law and religion.

We also welcome pertinent comments on current developments that reflect the views and opinions of their respective authors and meet the General Conditions applying to the site. However, those that do not meet those criteria or which are otherwise unidentifiable are unlikely to be published, especially comments that are abusive or defamatory. For more information see our comments policy below.

Frank Cranmer and David Pocklington

4 thoughts on “Welcome

  1. I’d encourage anyone who reads this to sign up, comment or guest blog. It is accurate, astonishingly varied and has the requirement required of all applicants for clerical posts, ‘gsoh’.

  2. Although I am an infrequent commentator, I do hope there is a proper diversity of views expressed here. I am often the only Catholic who posts (it seems) who is opposed to much of the current legislation that is primarily EU focused (to absurdity in many legal cases) and automatically adopted by our finest lawyers into UK law – as if we had any other legal option (we often don’t). There is room for Humanists, Protestants and Atheists (and even Islam in small measure) but we all collectively benefit from the freedoms of the Magna Carta, the definition between Church and State. It is, after all the basis of all our Common Law legislation and the concept of Charity (in the real meaning of the word), which has been much abused by all previous governments.

    The National Lottery is a case in point. And then the many Quangos and (government funded) NGOs that have charitable status is another worry. All open to abuse and often reported to the Charities Commission that can do little to prevent misappropriation on funds.

    Open Democracy is something we (UK) are very good at and I would support an elected second chamber (rather than what we have at the moment) but that is another discussion. Of course, there is no need for a second chamber in the next phase of EU integration. Nothing to debate and no legal challenges are allowed under EU law and no EU law can be overturned (there is no appeals process). Thank god we are out!

Leave a Reply