On Saturday 26th November, Leicester Diocesan Synod supported the proposal for creating the new diocesan role of Suffragan Bishop of Loughborough to replace that of the Assistant Bishop of Leicester on the retirement of Bishop Christopher Boyle, the former diocesan bishop of Northern Malawi. The Press Release states: “the proposal must now go to the Church of England’s national Synod, and if agreed by them it will then require royal assent. All being well, a new bishop could be appointed by the end of 2017”. Unlike the appointment to an existing but dormant see on which we posted earlier, new suffragan sees are seldom created; this post reviews the issues involved. Continue reading →
In An NHS Trust v T EWHC 2980 (Fam) Child T, the two-year-old son of Jehovah’s Witnesses, suffered from a low blood platelet count, which led his doctors to consider that he might have a medical condition affecting his bone marrow production . T’s consultant paediatric haematologist concluded that T would need to have blood products administered in order to prevent a very serious deterioration in his health .Continue reading →
In a guest post, Robert Meakin of Stone King LLP reassesses one of the leading cases on public benefit and the advancement of religion.
This article  revisits the case of Gilmour v Coats AC 426,  UKHL 1. It is a timely moment to revisit the case because there is doubt about the requirement of public benefit for charities with purposes to advance religion. The case deals with the issue of private religious practice and the extent to which a religious organisation needs to engage with the public. These are live issues which need resolving and therefore it is a good moment to challenge the assumptions made in Gilmour v Coats. Continue reading →
As part of Interfaith Week, Ed Kessler, Director of the Woolf Institute, posted The Value Of Religious Dialogue In An Increasingly Secular Age on Huffington Post. He begins from the contradiction between the dramatic increase in the number of people describing themselves as non-religious and the fact that religion “has rarely had such a central part in our national conversation”. Moreover,
“all too often religion is seen not as a source of comfort or a force for good but as a cause of division and distrust. In a world become less united by the day, religion is viewed as a powerful force pulling us apart.” Continue reading →
In a written submission to the Supreme Court, Scotland’s Lord Advocate, James Wolffe QC, argues that Holyrood’s consent should be sought over legislation invoking Article 50. The conclusions to the 58-page document are reproduced below: Continue reading →
Further to the Update on 18th November in which the Supreme Court confirmed that applications to intervene in R (on the application of Miller & Dos Santos) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union had been granted to: The Lord Advocate, Scottish Government; The Counsel General for Wales, Welsh Government; The ‘Expat Interveners’, George Birnie and Others; and The Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, the following Update on 25th November has been issued. Continue reading →